Five Ways to Close the Compliance Gap in AI Security
-
The article addresses the rapidly growing adoption of AI and the challenge of securing these systems in accordance with emerging frameworks like NIST AI-RMF, OWASP Top 10 for LLMs and GenAI, and MITRE ATLAS. It promotes integrating security into AI development from the start using "Secure by Design" principles to meet compliance requirements and reduce risks.
-
Key themes:
- AI Security Frameworks: Focus on NIST AI-RMF, OWASP Top 10 for LLMs and GenAI, and MITRE ATLAS as benchmarks for responsible and secure AI.
- Secure by Design: Emphasizes proactive security measures throughout the AI lifecycle, aligning with CISA's principles.
- Bridging the Compliance Gap: Offers practical steps to integrate security into AI development processes.
- AI Asset Management: Highlights the importance of a comprehensive AI asset inventory.
- Proactive Threat Modeling & Testing: Focuses on continuous evaluation and testing for AI-specific threats and vulnerabilities throughout the AI lifecycle, including vector-level controls.
-
Notable insights:
- A comprehensive AI asset inventory, including internal models, third-party services, and shadow AI initiatives, is foundational for security and compliance.
- Threat modeling should expand beyond traditional cyber risks to include AI-specific threats like prompt injection and data poisoning, requiring continuous updates to reflect system architecture.
- Observability in AI systems, through logging decision paths and tracking model versions, is crucial for explainability, accountability, and auditability.
- Modern AI systems with vector databases require AI-aware policy enforcement and access controls to prevent unauthorized content and semantic leakage.
- Applying Secure by Design principles leads to AI systems that are resilient, transparent, and trustworthy.