Which image editing model should I use?
This blog post from Replicate compares several AI image editing models across various tasks like object removal, perspective changes, background editing, text manipulation, and style transfer, providing a practical guide for users to select the best model based on their specific needs. The evaluation is done using Replicate's playground, allowing parallel testing and comparison of the models.
-
Model Variety: The market is saturated with image editing models, each excelling in different areas.
-
Task-Specific Performance: The ideal model choice is highly dependent on the intended application (e.g., SeedEdit for background editing, FLUX.1 Kontext for text editing).
-
Trade-offs: There are often trade-offs between cost, inference time, and image editing quality.
-
Replicate's Playground: Replicate offers a platform for users to directly compare models.
-
Object Removal Success Varies: While most models handle object removal adequately, some, like FLUX.1 Kontext, can struggle.
-
Perspective Transformation Leaders: GPT Image 1 and Qwen Image Edit perform well in altering viewing angles while retaining character consistency.
-
ByteDance Models Excel in Background Editing: SeedEdit and Seedream show strength in seamlessly integrating characters into new environments.
-
Text Editing Nuances: FLUX.1 Kontext and Nano Banana stand out for preserving typography and texture during text manipulation.
-
Style Transfer Subjectivity: Style transfer outcomes are quite varied, reflecting different models' interpretations of artistic styles.