SF Compute: Commoditizing Compute to solve the GPU Bubble forever
This Latent Space podcast episode features Evan Conrad, CEO of SF Compute, discussing the economics of the GPU market, particularly in light of CoreWeave's IPO and the perceived GPU bubble. The conversation dives into the nuances of GPU pricing, utilization, and the potential for commoditizing GPU compute through marketplace dynamics.
-
GPU Market Dynamics: The discussion highlights the unique characteristics of the GPU market compared to traditional CPU clouds, emphasizing the price sensitivity of customers and the importance of long-term contracts.
-
CoreWeave's Business Model: CoreWeave is analyzed as a real estate/banking business, securing long-term contracts with low-risk customers to obtain favorable interest rates, rather than a traditional cloud or software company.
-
SF Compute's Marketplace Approach: SF Compute aims to create a liquid GPU market, enabling more flexible and efficient utilization of GPU resources through spot pricing and short-term reservations, ultimately seeking to commoditize GPU compute.
-
Financialization of GPUs: The long-term vision includes the development of a futures market for GPUs to reduce risk, stabilize pricing, and attract more capital into the GPU infrastructure space.
-
Hyperscalers may lose money on reselling NVIDIA GPUs: Unlike CPUs, simply reselling GPUs doesn't work because hyperscalers could instead use the money to train their own models or compete with NVIDIA.
-
Combining hardware and software in GPU cloud offerings is a risky move: Companies like Modal and CoreWeave who focus on either software or hardware respectively are more likely to succeed than those trying to do both.
-
VC-provided GPU clusters are a credit risk arbitrage opportunity: VCs can obtain loans more easily than startups, allowing them to offer compute in exchange for equity.
-
Peering-to-peer GPU networks have speed-of-light limitations: Overcome by co-location, such a network would resemble SF Compute's marketplace.